Grammar All Over the Body

David Wojnarowicz
Memories That Smell Like Gasoline
San Francisco: Artspace Books, 1992

and I realize he’s one of those guys that you know absolutely that
if you’d met him twenty years earlier you both could have gone
straight to heaven but now mortality has finally marked his face. He
was really sexy though; he was like a vast swimming pool I wanted
to dive right into.

Intrigued by how this meditation surfaces to arrest and fix the reader in the midst of a description of hot sex — it’s the tenses — we bring to mind in the present an experience to examine and then climb out of the past into the possibility of the conditional and then into the present touched by death through a perfect indicative which doesn’t delay us from a plunge right into an infinitive

And so for day 2130
12.10.2012

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Embracing A Most Peculiar Aside

A Summary Account . . .

(I should say somewhere about here that when I say “he” I also mean “she”: as the late President Smith used to say, man generally embraces woman.)

Northrop Frye By Liberal Things (1959). This is his address upon his installation as Principal of Victoria College.

The aside can be read as a humorous touch of heteronormativity. Tone is all. But for even the tone-deaf, it is the “generally” that once spotted works its magic. It signals exceptions. Other ways.

Indeed the context of the aside is set in the commonplace of attending university to find oneself.

Finding out why they went is something that comes much later, if it comes at all. An inscrutable Providence has decreed that they should be at university during the mating season, and for some students, going to college is partly a sexual ritual, like the ceremonial dances of the whooping crane. More thoughtful students are fond of asking themselves and each other why they came to college, and their reasons are generally [there’s that keyword again] given in terms of usefulness. But the thoughtful student soon realizes that the university is not there to be useful to him; he is there to be useful to it. It does not help him to prepare for life: life will not stay around to be prepared for. […] There is no answer to the student’s question, for the only place an answer can come from is an experience that he has not yet had. [enter the aside quoted above].

How is it that I come to read “generally” as offering a sliver? By training as a reader. Training I generally received at university.

Such close reading partakes of the moves made by José Esteban Muñoz in Cruising Utopia: The Then and There of Queer Futurity (2009). He draws upon the work of Ernest Bloch (The Principle of Hope) to carve out space for the work of the experience-not-yet-had.

The point is once again to pull from the past, the no-longer-conscious, described and represented by Bloch today, to push beyond the impasse of the present.

Between the then of Frye and the then of Muñoz lies the publication of The Handbook of Nonsexist Writing: For writers, editors, and speakers first published in 1980 by Casey Miller and Kate Swift. And after them all a challenge to recite the specificity of desire: “Every gay person has been in a situation where less specific pronouns are useful, perhaps even a safety measure […] “you” has fallen out of favour and pop seems joyfully full of new young artists not only being candid about who their songs are lusting after, but celebrating that point of difference, too.”

I remember as a youth before attending university listening to “I Don’t Know How to Love Him” lifted from Jesus Christ Superstar and performed by Helen Reddy. Long before I learnt about shifters like the pronoun “I” (Émile Benveniste), long before I could claim experience of many before, long before the mysteries of incarnation shone for me, I was queering the text:

I don’t know how to take this
I don’t see why he moves me
He’s a man he’s just a man
And I’ve had so many men before
In very many ways he’s just one more

Muñoz again:

Queerness’s form is utopian. Ultimately, we must insist on a queer futurity because the present is so poisonous and insolvent. A resource that cannot be discounted to know the future is indeed the no-longer-conscious, that thing or place that may be extinguished but not yet discharged in its utopian potentiality.

insolvent – discounted – discharged
Bills come due. But who is doing the accounting? Who keeps the general ledger?

And so for day 2128
10.10.2012

Posted in Reading | Tagged | Leave a comment

A burn deeper than a bonfire

On the afterlife of trees

First the note:

‘La Quercia del Tasso’ or ‘Tasso’s Oak’ on Janiculum (Gianicolo) hill, Rome, is said to have been a place of rest and contemplation for Renaissance poet Torquato Tasso in the weeks before his death at the nearby Monastery of Sant’Onofrio. The tree is propped up by iron supports, having been struck by lightening in 1811.

Now the conclusion to the poem.

the burning starts. The time will come
when I will need to breathe for you, when we two
will crackle, our cinders’ unobserved
parabolas like brief, celestial monsters, or space-
                        junk some call shooting stars.

Jaya Sevige. Surfaces of Air. “La Quercia del Tasso”

It is the tree speaking.

And so for day 2127
09.10.2012

Posted in Poetry | Leave a comment

Anatomy Lesson

Jaya Sevige. Surfaces of Air. “Sand Island”

What cleaves each muscle of wave
from its bone of ocean?

          Hear the snap
of its ligaments.
Listen to the severing of tendons.

Sevige’s poem is a way of making sense of Lauren Berlant’s claim that the making of muscle involves the rupture of tendons:

Another way to think about your metaphor, Michael, is that in order to make a muscle you have to rip your tendons.

From a discussion held at the Banff Centre for the Arts: No One is Sovereign in Love: A Conversation Between Lauren Berlant and Michael Hardt – Heather Davis & Paige Sarlin, an excerpt from that discussion has been posted by NoMorePotlucks. Here is the remark from Michael Hardt to which Berlant was responding:

Spinoza defines love as the increase of our joy, that is, the increase of our power to act and think, with the recognition of an external cause. You can see why Spinoza says self-love is a nonsense term, since it involves no external cause. Love is thus necessarily collective and expansive in the sense that it increases our power and hence our joy. Here’s one way of thinking about the transformative character of love: we always lose ourselves in love, but we lose ourselves in love in the way that has a duration, and is not simply rupture. To use a limited metaphor, if you think about love as muscles, they require a kind of training and increase with use. Love as a social muscle has to involve a kind of askesis, a kind of training in order to increase its power, but this has to be done in cooperation with many.

And hence the notion of “ocean” and the deterioration of the body’s parts … mini-ruptures to effect a sense of duration … wave upon wave

One way of thinking through Berlant’s startling if counterfactual statement is to consider the tendon in its function of attaching muscle to bone. To sever the connection between muscle and bone induces a form of paralysis — it’s experienced as a form of violation. Berlant continues:

The thing I like about love as a concept for the possibility of the social, is that love always means non-sovereignty. Love is always about violating your own attachment to your intentionality, without being anti-intentional. I like that love is greedy. You want incommensurate things and you want them now. And the now part is important.

The question of duration is also important in this regard because there are many places that one holds duration. One holds duration in one’s head, and one holds duration in relation. As a formal relation, love could have continuity, whereas, as an experiential relation it could have discontinuities.

I want this metaphor to work. I turn to wave and ocean. I am in love with the image of bone, muscle and tendon. I intuit their decomposition.

To make a muscle — to focus attention upon it — is to dissect.

And so for day 2126
08.10.2012

Posted in Metaphor | Leave a comment

Coming Between Self and Flesh: from “of” to “on”

Indigeneity: Theorized Materialised

Billy-Ray Belcourt
This Wound is a World: Poems
“The Cree Word for a Body like Mine is Weesageechak”

its final lines offering a big beginning

was once a broad-shouldered trickster who long ago fell from the
moon wearing make-up and skinny jeans

Form. Disguise. Body shifting.

It is the Epilogue that sparks further consideration of inhabiting a body or being out of one:

This Wound is a World is a book obsessed with the unbodied. It is a book that chases after a scene that can barely be spotted. It is a book that only liked to be written if I stared long enough in the direction of nowhere, which is probably more accurately everywhere. Everywhere, of course, is the space that death carves into everyday life.

Meditations on “unbodied”

Belcourt’s essay on self-care and the décrochage offered by the practice of masturbation explores the ontological frontier erected by colonization. See Decolonial Love and the Thingly Future section in Masturbatory Ethics, Anarchic Objects: Notes on Decolonial Love available on line thanks to the library at the University of Alberta.

Decolonial love therefore promises not only to chip away at the corporeal and emotional toll of settler colonialism as such, but also to gestate a wider set of worlds and ontologies, ones that we cannot know in advance, but ones that might make life into something more than a taxing state of survival.

Beyond survival

For me, masturbation is about a strange encounter, to evoke Sara Ahmed’s term,44 between the self and the flesh whose form and outcome we cannot know in advance, but that occurs vis-à-vis but also in contrast to a prior and sometimes ghost-like history of colonial rupture that blocked and still blocks our relation to the psychic and the corporeal.

44See Sara Ahmed, Strange Encounters: Embodied Others in Post-Coloniality

On decolonialization

It is a teleology of the elsewhere whereby new strategies for survival and wanting replace the ones we have inherited in a world bent on our disappearance, literally and juridically.

“Unbodied” raises for me to the question of embodiment and the possibility of thinking sous rature of the phrase “embodiment of” — but instead of this deconstructive move I follow a substitution of prepositions: instead of “of” it is a positioning of “from/to” that recognizes the past and projects a future or should we say “futures” — and again I return to the problematic “of” implying a single source origin — needing to think the multiple plural nature of origin

embodiment: getting into the body instead of unhinging the body marked a bio-politics of my non-indigenous time and place where our models were those of autotelic structures (Maturana and Varela)

back to that “of” — there’s a point of thinking the self in terms of textual stemma or the branching of the tree of life that is the self inhabiting an environment (thinking of the thinking done by Robert Bringhurst on this notion that the individual, self or text, arises from an ecosystem) — entertaining the unbodied state is potentially recognizing the boundaries being permeable and that self is not self without a whole host of others (and things) — “of” of course has a sense of belonging (to) but it can also express a relationship between a part and a whole – ecosystems again

[Note the common “mistake” of using “of” instead of “have” in constructions such as “you should have asked” (not you should of asked).] In my reading, this is the grammatical pressure point of “of” – depossession, self-possession, possession – that “unbodied” circles like a strange attractor: a systemic stepping out of the self to repossess a future decolonized self or a set of possiblities of becoming . . .

Last word to Belcourt (last words of the Epilogue): “It [This Wound is a World] insists that loneliness is endemic to the affective life of settler colonialism, but that it is also an affective commons of sorts that demonstrates that there is something about this world that isn’t quite right, that loneliness in fact evinces a new world on the horizon.

of on the horizon

And so for day 2125
07.10.2012

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Spin and Rinse

Jaya Savige. latecomers. “West end”.

I want it to stop here where it began.

this gentle aphasia
washes over us like fabric softener.

I don’t want to follow the simile into a full-blown conceit. But I read on implanting the two lines like senyru in the laundry like coins forgotten in a pocket. Like the glitch of language tumbled dry. It never shrinks.

And so for day 2124
06.10.2012

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Repetition Inversion Inversion Repetition

Jay Hopler in “The Coast Road”, the last poem in The Abridged History of Rain, invites us to pay attention:

It’s not what one listens to that matters,
But what one listens for

I listen for repetition. I listen for inversion.

Take for instance the repetitions in “Umbrian Anecdotes”. They unroll like school exercises. In one instance “east” is replaced by “west” and the parakeets in both instances “fly chattering, pieces of ripe fig falling from their orange beaks.” These lines from the second stanza provide the bridge between the opening stanza and the third.

Every evening, at sunset, a company of green parakeets leaves the
     fig trees in the garden

[…]

Every evening, at sunset, these parakeets fly, pieces of ripe fig
     falling in the garden

Look what he does with dogs in the eighth section of “The Rooster King”

Dogs pass no laws against you and knock not they your
    &#160 daughters up and do not to Manhattan go with your last two
      hundred dollars so, in general
Dogs are A-OK with me.

Later in section thirteen (“So Many Birds to Kill and So Few Stones”) we read “one / cannot help but flattened be by the persistence of the beautiful thing” where we almost read presence for persistence.

And so for day 2123
05.10.2012

Posted in Poetry | Leave a comment

This nor This is not That and not I

Amazing syntactic twist unfolds round a series of negations marking transitoriness and ending with endurance of the self…

This is not the moon,
Nor is this the spring,
Of other springs,
And I alone
Am still the same

Translated by Kenneth Rexroth from Ariwawa No Narihira, collected in One Hundred Poems from the Japanese.

And so for day 2122
04.10.2012

Posted in Poetry, Translations | Leave a comment

Unravelling

Michele Leggott
Milk & Honey
“festival junction”

6
string of events
string of memories
string I bring
into the labyrinth

I like how the poet brings the reader in bit by bit until resting on the present tense we are there in the middle of it all.

There is a neat little trick of progressions in the list and a neat trick of arresting motion in the use of the present tense.

And so for day 2121
03.10.2012

Posted in Poetry | Tagged | Leave a comment

Not Far From The Tree

Trees are sometimes consigned to fire: Tree Destiny. Here Gracian provides a choice between two options (and of course is speaking metaphorically as well).

There are trees and there are trees. Some bear fruit, while others are barren. Know well the use for both — one for provision and profit — the other for timber.

Translated by Thomas G. Corvan.

This is of course offered as a way of judging people: but are we not all firewood in the end (unless we sink and rot, enriching the soil)?

And so for day 2120
02.10.2012

Posted in Metaphor | Tagged | Leave a comment